IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v29y2023i6p1139-1156_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of work design and work status on part-time employees' inclusion and work engagement: some Australian evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Sarich, Jennifer
  • Kiffin-Petersen, Sandra
  • Soutar, Geoff

Abstract

Increasing numbers of people are working part-time (PT) hours, sometimes involuntarily (IPT). Australia has the fourth highest percentage of PT employees among Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries (26%). This study examines relationships between work design factors and workplace inclusion for PT employees and identifies how perceived inclusion and work engagement of PT and IPT employees compares with full-time (FT) employees. Data were collected using an online questionnaire distributed to employees in Australia. A part-time work design model was developed and tested across two independent samples using partial least squares. Results suggest that PT and IPT employees feel less included in the workplace compared to FT employees. PT employees also perceive their roles to be less task interdependent. A key finding was that PT employees' perceived inclusion was related to proactive behaviors, autonomy, and job crafting, in addition to hours worked. Implications for the management of PT employees are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarich, Jennifer & Kiffin-Petersen, Sandra & Soutar, Geoff, 2023. "Influence of work design and work status on part-time employees' inclusion and work engagement: some Australian evidence," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(6), pages 1139-1156, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:29:y:2023:i:6:p:1139-1156_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367221000523/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:29:y:2023:i:6:p:1139-1156_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.