IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v29y2023i6p1077-1102_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Categorisation of organisation dualities using the Delphi technique

Author

Listed:
  • Biloslavo, Roberto
  • Edgar, David Alex
  • Rusjan, Roland

Abstract

This paper presents the case of a non-traditional use of the Delphi method in order to explore organisational duality and reach a consensus on the 23 organisational dualities which allow for a classification into a three-tier organisational policy model (TTOP-model). The expert group was composed of seven experts from the field of management. The process ran for four rounds to reach the final consensus examining 25 dualities and eventually focusing them down to the final 23. In addition to their practical relevance of understanding the dualities, the findings also have implications for both the literature on strategic management and the paradox lens on organisational theory through an understanding of duality in terms of the TTOP model. This research not only advances conversations in strategic management but also helps to increase confidence when adopting the Delphi method for a wider recognition of the method within both interpretivist studies and paradox research.

Suggested Citation

  • Biloslavo, Roberto & Edgar, David Alex & Rusjan, Roland, 2023. "Categorisation of organisation dualities using the Delphi technique," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(6), pages 1077-1102, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:29:y:2023:i:6:p:1077-1102_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367222000827/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:29:y:2023:i:6:p:1077-1102_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.