IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v28y2022i2p283-307_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of co-worker exclusion and performance outcomes: are different forms of support helpful or hurtful?

Author

Listed:
  • Cruz, Kevin S.
  • Zagenczyk, Thomas J.
  • Scott, Kristin L.
  • Purvis, Russell L.

Abstract

We argue that social support can be helpful or hurtful in the context of performance outcomes for employees experiencing co-worker exclusion. We contend that employees' perceptions of co-worker exclusion are negatively associated with task performance and citizenship, and positively associated with interpersonal deviance. We further contend that whether social support strengthens or weakens the negative performance outcomes of co-worker exclusion depends on whether the source of social support is from co-workers or family and friends. Using data obtained from 135 supervisor–subordinate dyads across various occupational positions, we find that co-worker support is hurtful, whereas family and friends support is helpful. We also find a three-way interaction: task performance suffers most when employees who feel highly excluded also perceive higher co-worker support and lower family and friends support. These results suggest a need for a more nuanced view of social exchange/support, and build our knowledge about ambivalent relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Cruz, Kevin S. & Zagenczyk, Thomas J. & Scott, Kristin L. & Purvis, Russell L., 2022. "Perceptions of co-worker exclusion and performance outcomes: are different forms of support helpful or hurtful?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 283-307, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:2:p:283-307_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367221000560/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:2:p:283-307_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.