IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v28y2022i1p202-220_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firm strategy and CSR: the moderating role of performance management systems

Author

Listed:
  • Galbreath, Jeremy
  • Lucianetti, Lorenzo
  • Tisch, Daniel
  • Thomas, Benjamin

Abstract

Little empirical research has explored whether or not firm strategy is linked with corporate social responsibility (CSR) and to that end we explore the impact of low-cost and differentiation strategies on CSR. Using a sample of 229 Italian firms, a low-cost strategy is negatively associated with ethical and discretionary CSR, while a differentiation strategy is positively associated with both. Given its focus on nonfinancial outcomes and stakeholders, we test if a performance management system (PM system) acts as a moderating influence. We find that a PM system positively moderates the negative association between a low-cost strategy and ethical and discretionary CSR, while also positively moderating these relationships with respect to a differentiation strategy. These findings advance the literature on strategy and CSR, while demonstrating the contingent effect of PM systems. The findings are discussed along with limitations and directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Galbreath, Jeremy & Lucianetti, Lorenzo & Tisch, Daniel & Thomas, Benjamin, 2022. "Firm strategy and CSR: the moderating role of performance management systems," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 202-220, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:202-220_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367220000279/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:202-220_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.