IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v28y2022i1p184-201_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived corporate social responsibility and employee ethical behaviour: do employee commitment and co-worker ethicality matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Sarfo, Christian Agyapong
  • Zhang, Jing A.
  • O'Kane, Paula
  • Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya
  • Osei-Fosu, Kizito Kwabena

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) plays an important role in promoting workplace ethics. However, most research has focused on CSRs’ performance or favourable performance-related behaviour outcomes. Little is known about how individual employees perceive CSR and how this affects their ethical behaviour. This research examines how employees' perceived corporate social responsibility (PCSR) facilitates their ethical behaviour. Specifically, we hypothesise that PCSR influences employee ethical behaviour by enhancing employees' organisational commitment. The relationship between employees' commitment and ethical behaviour is contingent on their co-workers' ethical behaviour. The hypothesised relationships were assessed using partial least squares structural equation modelling with a sample of 300 employees from ‘The Ghana Club 100’ firms. Our findings suggest that employee commitment serves as an effective mechanism through which employees' perception enhances their ethical behaviour. The findings also show that the weaker the co-workers' ethical behaviour, the stronger the relationship between employee commitment and ethical behaviour. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarfo, Christian Agyapong & Zhang, Jing A. & O'Kane, Paula & Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya & Osei-Fosu, Kizito Kwabena, 2022. "Perceived corporate social responsibility and employee ethical behaviour: do employee commitment and co-worker ethicality matter?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 184-201, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:184-201_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367221000420/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:184-201_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.