IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v27y2021i6p1038-1059_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding stressor–strain relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of social support, adjustment to remote work, and work–life conflict

Author

Listed:
  • van Zoonen, Ward
  • Sivunen, Anu
  • Blomqvist, Kirsimarja
  • Olsson, Thomas
  • Ropponen, Annina
  • Henttonen, Kaisa
  • Vartiainen, Matti

Abstract

This study investigates how the transition to remote work during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is experienced by employees. We investigate to what extent perceived work stressors relate to psychological strain through perceptions of social support, work–life conflict, and adjustment to remote work. The findings expound the mechanisms underlying psychological strain in the context of sudden organizational change. Specifically, this study shows that both challenge stressors and hindrance stressors have negative impact on adjustment to remote work, whereas hindrance stressors are more strongly negatively related to social support. The study further demonstrates that there is hardly any buffering impact of job control, work structuring, and communication technology use on the implications of these work stressors. These findings contribute to our theoretical understanding and provide actionable implications for organizational policies in facilitating employees' adaptation to remote work.

Suggested Citation

  • van Zoonen, Ward & Sivunen, Anu & Blomqvist, Kirsimarja & Olsson, Thomas & Ropponen, Annina & Henttonen, Kaisa & Vartiainen, Matti, 2021. "Understanding stressor–strain relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of social support, adjustment to remote work, and work–life conflict," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(6), pages 1038-1059, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:6:p:1038-1059_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S183336722100050X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:6:p:1038-1059_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.