IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v27y2021i6p1021-1037_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open-plan office noise is stressful: multimodal stress detection in a simulated work environment

Author

Listed:
  • Sander, Elizabeth (Libby) J.
  • Marques, Cecelia
  • Birt, James
  • Stead, Matthew
  • Baumann, Oliver

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019)-induced changes in the workplace present a timely opportunity for human resource management practitioners to consider and remediate the deleterious effects of noise, a commonly cited complaint of employees working in open-plan office (OPO) environments. While self-reports suggest that OPO noise is perceived as a stressor, there is little experimental research comprehensively investigating the effects of noise on employees in terms of their cognitive performance, physiological indicators of stress, and affect. Employing a simulated office setting, we compared the effects of a typical OPO auditory environment to a quieter private office auditory environment on a range of objective and subjective measures of well-being and performance. While OPO noise did not reduce immediate cognitive task performance compared to the quieter environment, it did reduce psychological well-being as evidenced by self-reports of mood, facial expressions of emotion, and physiological indicators of stress in the form of heartrate and skin conductivity. Our research highlights the importance of using a multimodal approach to assess the impact of workplace stressors such as noise. Such an approach will allow HR practitioners to make data-driven recommendations about the design and modification of workspaces to minimize negative effects and support employee well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Sander, Elizabeth (Libby) J. & Marques, Cecelia & Birt, James & Stead, Matthew & Baumann, Oliver, 2021. "Open-plan office noise is stressful: multimodal stress detection in a simulated work environment," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(6), pages 1021-1037, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:6:p:1021-1037_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367221000171/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:27:y:2021:i:6:p:1021-1037_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.