IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v26y2020i6p1030-1047_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The wicked problem of measuring real-world research impact: Using sustainable development goals (SDGs) and targets in academia

Author

Listed:
  • Chapman, Geoffrey R.
  • Cully, Ashley
  • Kosiol, Jennifer
  • Macht, Stephanie A.
  • Chapman, Ross L.
  • Fitzgerald, Janna Anneke
  • Gertsen, Frank

Abstract

This paper proposes that the United Nation's sustainable development goals (SDGs) and associated targets form an effective framework for determining real-world research impact. Existing bibliometrics that assess the quality of academic work are usually quantitative and self-referential, reducing the focus on real-world issues. The same measurements are often adopted by funding bodies, pressuring researchers to increase compliance, and further reducing integrity and real-world impact. A series of world cafés were conducted, collecting data on how researchers, their institutions, and network organisations can contribute to, and measure research aligned with the SDGs and targets. The results showed that participants were generally positive towards using the SDGs and targets to measure impact and quality of academic research. Suggestions to assist greater adoption of the SDGs and targets as a measure of impact included: aligning governmental and institutional funding; changing key performance indicators; increasing cross-disciplinary work; aligning mission/vision statements; and legitimising SDG-focused projects at conferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Chapman, Geoffrey R. & Cully, Ashley & Kosiol, Jennifer & Macht, Stephanie A. & Chapman, Ross L. & Fitzgerald, Janna Anneke & Gertsen, Frank, 2020. "The wicked problem of measuring real-world research impact: Using sustainable development goals (SDGs) and targets in academia," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(6), pages 1030-1047, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:26:y:2020:i:6:p:1030-1047_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367220000164/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:26:y:2020:i:6:p:1030-1047_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.