IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v26y2020i5p657-676_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical examination of the emergence of collective psychological ownership in work team contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Pierce, Jon L.
  • Li, Dahui
  • Jussila, Iiro
  • Wang, Jianyou

Abstract

As work teams have increasingly become the cornerstone of the post bureaucratic organization, there have been calls for a greater understanding of collective thought and action. Such understanding is deemed important for the design and management of teamwork. Theory suggests that feelings of ownership manifest themselves at the collective level, and positively affect team performance effectiveness. This study illuminates the role played by teamwork complexity and team self-management in the emergence of the psychological processes that are associated with the manifestation of job-focused collective psychological ownership (CPO). In addition, employment of serial mediation suggests that both teamwork dimensions put employees on two routes (intimate knowing of and the collective investment of the team members' selves into the job) that lead to the emergence of a collective sense of ownership, and together these two route variables and CPO sequentially mediated a positive relationship between teamwork design and team performance effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierce, Jon L. & Li, Dahui & Jussila, Iiro & Wang, Jianyou, 2020. "An empirical examination of the emergence of collective psychological ownership in work team contexts," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(5), pages 657-676, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:26:y:2020:i:5:p:657-676_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367219000683/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:26:y:2020:i:5:p:657-676_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.