IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v26y2020i3p355-374_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brilliant renal care: A really positive study of patient, carer, and staff experiences within an Australian health service

Author

Listed:
  • Kippist, Louise
  • Fulop, Liz
  • Dadich, Ann
  • Smyth, Anne

Abstract

Drawing on a positive organizational scholarship (POS) approach, this paper presents findings from the first of a two-part study exploring user experiences of brilliant renal care within the Regional Dialysis Centre in Blacktown (RDC-B). A world café method was used engaging patients, carers, and staff in conversations about brilliance. Practitioners led the study, seeking to validate their claims that the RDC-B is an exemplar of brilliant care. Pragmatics dominated the fieldwork. Researchers and practitioners collaborated throughout the study, including hosting two world cafés. Key findings from the study are that the RDC-B is completely patient and relationally-centred, with high-quality connections, dedicated and competent staff providing a complete, responsive, and personalized service that is also like being in a family. Drawing on POS, we suggest that relational-centred care requires at the very least high-quality connections and relational coordination to build and sustain the levels of positivity identified in the RDC-B.

Suggested Citation

  • Kippist, Louise & Fulop, Liz & Dadich, Ann & Smyth, Anne, 2020. "Brilliant renal care: A really positive study of patient, carer, and staff experiences within an Australian health service," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 355-374, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:26:y:2020:i:3:p:355-374_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367219000555/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:26:y:2020:i:3:p:355-374_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.