IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v25y2019i06p876-895_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of team reflexivity as a mediator between project management skills, task familiarity, procedural justice, and product performance

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Wann-Yih
  • Amaya Rivas, Adriana
  • Chen, Yen-Chun

Abstract

Even though the importance of team reflexivity in new product development (NPD) has been well noted in the literature, little attention has been paid to its determinants. Based on the resource-based view, this study proposes that project management skills, task familiarity, and procedural justice are useful to improve team reflexivity. As such, this study also examines the influences that these antecedents and team reflexivity have on NPD. A research framework is proposed along with 10 major hypotheses. To test these, data were collected from 186 team members from NPD teams in Taiwanese high-tech firms, and the partial least square results of confirm that all three of the proposed antecedents have direct impacts on team reflexivity and NPD performance. Task familiarity had the highest mediation effect on the influence of project management skills on NPD performance, followed by team reflexivity and procedural justice. Since previous studies largely ignored the effects of antecedents on team reflexivity and NPD performance, this study provides useful insights for both academics and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Wann-Yih & Amaya Rivas, Adriana & Chen, Yen-Chun, 2019. "The role of team reflexivity as a mediator between project management skills, task familiarity, procedural justice, and product performance," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(6), pages 876-895, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:25:y:2019:i:06:p:876-895_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367217000347/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:25:y:2019:i:06:p:876-895_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.