IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v22y2016i04p535-548_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collectivism-oriented human resource management and innovation performance: An examination of team reflexivity and team psychological safety

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Silu
  • Zhang, Guanglei
  • Zhang, Anfu
  • Xu, Jieying

Abstract

This article investigated how collectivism-oriented human resource management can influence on innovation performance through team reflexivity and team psychological safety. Using a sample of 200 research-oriented teams in Chinese universities, the empirical results clearly indicate that collectivism-oriented human resource management is beneficial to teams’ innovation performance. The results of the mediating model show how team reflexivity and team psychological safety mediate the relationship between collectivism-oriented human resource management and innovation performance. The implications for researchers and practitioners are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Silu & Zhang, Guanglei & Zhang, Anfu & Xu, Jieying, 2016. "Collectivism-oriented human resource management and innovation performance: An examination of team reflexivity and team psychological safety," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 535-548, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:22:y:2016:i:04:p:535-548_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367215000504/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:22:y:2016:i:04:p:535-548_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.