IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v20y2014i04p526-543_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of voice efficacy in the formation of voice behaviour: A cross-level examination

Author

Listed:
  • Duan, Jinyun
  • Kwan, Ho Kwong
  • Ling, Bin

Abstract

We present a voice efficacy model to account for the effects of general self-efficacy, perceived team servant leadership, and perceived organisational support on voice behaviour. In particular, we predict that general self-efficacy, perceived team servant leadership, and perceived organisational support enhance voice behaviour via voice efficacy. We also examined the extent to which perceived organisational support moderates the effect of voice efficacy on voice such that the effect is stronger when perceived organisational support is high. Using data collected from 401 employees in 91 groups and 53 organisations in China and controlling for psychological safety, we obtained full support for our hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan, Jinyun & Kwan, Ho Kwong & Ling, Bin, 2014. "The role of voice efficacy in the formation of voice behaviour: A cross-level examination," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 526-543, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:20:y:2014:i:04:p:526-543_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367214000406/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guiyao Tang & Ho Kwong Kwan & Deyuan Zhang & Zhou Zhu, 2016. "Work–Family Effects of Servant Leadership: The Roles of Emotional Exhaustion and Personal Learning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 285-297, August.
    2. Hung-Yi Liao & Kang-Hwa Shaw, 2020. "Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice: Roles of Obligation Perception and Power Distance Orientation," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(3), pages 25-33, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:20:y:2014:i:04:p:526-543_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.