IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v13y2007i04p312-330_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the benefits of entrepreneurship at different levels of analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Luke, Belinda
  • Verreynne, Martie-Louise
  • Kearins, Kate

Abstract

This paper presents a suggested framework for future research designs to examine the benefits of entrepreneurship, both non-financial and financial. Based on a review of the literature and using contextual exemplars throughout the paper with an Australia and New Zealand focus, we identify a range of benefits from entrepreneurship at the various levels of analysis (e.g. individual, organizational, national). From a non-financial perspective such benefits include independence, autonomy, competitive advantage, increased market share, employment and increased standards of living. From a financial perspective, entrepreneurships benefits include enhanced remuneration or rent from revenue, profits, cash flow, return on investment and increases in GDP – specific financial measures to be expressed in clear financial terms. The suggested framework represents both an initial step towards the measurement of entrepreneurships financial benefits and a valuable starting point for the development of a theory of the non-financial and financial benefits of entrepreneurship.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke, Belinda & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Kearins, Kate, 2007. "Measuring the benefits of entrepreneurship at different levels of analysis," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 312-330, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:13:y:2007:i:04:p:312-330_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367200003576/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigues Brás Gonçalo & Soukiazis Elias, 2019. "The Determinants of Entrepreneurship at the Country Level: A Panel Data Approach," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Jaroslaw Korpysa & Uma Shankar Singh & Swapnil Singh, 2023. "Validation of Decision Criteria and Determining Factors Importance in Advocating for Sustainability of Entrepreneurial Startups towards Social Inclusion and Capacity Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Mioduchowska-Jaroszewicz Edyta, 2020. "An Analysis of Entrepreneurship in Family-Owned Stock Companies," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 20(1), pages 266-285, June.
    4. Nadia Albu & Ruxandra Adriana Mateescu, 2015. "The Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Corporate Governance The Case of Romanian listed Companies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 1-44, February.
    5. Kenneth E. Poole & Allison Forbes & Nichelle Williams, 2023. "Applied Regional Economic Research Can Improve Development Strategies and Drive Better Outcomes," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(1), pages 85-95, February.
    6. Çakmak, Erdinç & Lie, Rico & McCabe, Scott, 2018. "Reframing informal tourism entrepreneurial practices: Capital and field relations structuring the informal tourism economy of Chiang Mai," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 37-47.
    7. Kerianne Lawson, 2022. "Currency iconography and entrepreneurship," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 257-264, December.
    8. Cory Hallam & Anita Leffel & Raúl Calvoz, 2015. "Identification of Temporal Construal Effects on Entrepreneurial Employment Desirability in STEM Students," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 24(2), pages 204-222, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:13:y:2007:i:04:p:312-330_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.