IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v19y2023i6p764-786_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political regimes and firms' decisions to pay bribes: theory and evidence from firm-level surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Nishioka, Shuichiro
  • Sharma, Sumi
  • Le, Tuan Viet

Abstract

This paper makes the most of the observed actions of bribe takers and givers from the World Bank Enterprise Surveys and studies how a taker's action influences a giver's decision to pay bribes. To motivate our empirical study, we consider Kaufmann and Wei's (1999) Stackelberg game between a tax authority and a firm that undergoes tax inspection. The model predicts that, when the authority can use its action as a credible threat for the firm's profitability, the authority disturbs the firm by inspecting more, and the firm is more likely to pay bribes. Consistent with the theoretical prediction, we find correlational evidence that the propensity to pay bribes increases with the number of inspection visits, particularly for non-democratic countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Nishioka, Shuichiro & Sharma, Sumi & Le, Tuan Viet, 2023. "Political regimes and firms' decisions to pay bribes: theory and evidence from firm-level surveys," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 764-786, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:19:y:2023:i:6:p:764-786_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137423000164/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:19:y:2023:i:6:p:764-786_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.