IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v19y2023i1p137-158_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do partisan politics influence domestic credit?

Author

Listed:
  • Tawiah, Vincent
  • Nadarajah, Sivathaasan
  • Alam, Md Samsul
  • Allen, Tom

Abstract

Left-leaning and right-leaning governments hold opposing views on economic policy, resulting in disparities in economic behaviours and outcomes. Given this context, we explore the effect of political ideology on domestic credit using an unbalanced panel data of 29 countries from 1960 to 2014. Our empirical analysis shows that left-leaning governments reduce total domestic credit allocations. Also, we find that right-leaning governments provide more credit to the private sector, while left-leaning governments prefer to boost domestic credit to the public sector. In a further analysis, we show that political parties and their domestic credit strategies remain unchanged even during electoral periods. Our novel insights, that are robust to alternative measures, samples, and a set of econometric identifications, contribute to the literature on partisan politics and lending behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Tawiah, Vincent & Nadarajah, Sivathaasan & Alam, Md Samsul & Allen, Tom, 2023. "Do partisan politics influence domestic credit?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 137-158, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:137-158_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137422000182/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:137-158_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.