IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v18y2022i6p969-980_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Donald T. Campbell on the institutions of scientific knowledge and the limits to interdisciplinarity

Author

Listed:
  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M.

Abstract

Extracts from an important article by the American psychologist, philosopher and social scientist Donald T. Campbell are reproduced here, with an introduction underlining the importance of his argument for today. Campbell identified disciplinary boundaries as enablers of specialization but often barriers to scientific innovation and shared knowledge. But instead of unbounded interdisciplinarity, Campbell argued for focused specialisms that cross disciplinary boundaries. This argument is particularly relevant for the development of institutional research in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 2022. "Donald T. Campbell on the institutions of scientific knowledge and the limits to interdisciplinarity," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(6), pages 969-980, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:6:p:969-980_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137422000121/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:6:p:969-980_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.