IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v18y2022i5p807-826_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic freedom improves income mobility: evidence from Canadian provinces, 1982–2018

Author

Listed:
  • Dean, James
  • Geloso, Vincent

Abstract

Economic freedom is robustly associated with income growth, but does this association extend to the poorest in a society? In this paper, we employ Canada's longitudinal cohorts of income mobility between 1982 and 2018 to answer this question. We find that economic freedom, as measured by the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of North America (EFNA) index, is positively associated with multiple measures of income mobility for people in the lowest income deciles, including (a) absolute income gain; (b) the percentage of people with rising income; and (c) average decile mobility. For the overall population, economic freedom has weaker effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean, James & Geloso, Vincent, 2022. "Economic freedom improves income mobility: evidence from Canadian provinces, 1982–2018," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 807-826, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:5:p:807-826_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137421000850/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:5:p:807-826_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.