IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v18y2022i5p707-723_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain networks as constitutional and competitive polycentric orders

Author

Listed:
  • Alston, Eric
  • Law, Wilson
  • Murtazashvili, Ilia
  • Weiss, Martin

Abstract

Institutional economists have analyzed permissionless blockchains as a novel institutional building block for voluntary economic exchange and distributed governance, with their unique protocol features such as automated contract execution, high levels of network and process transparency, and uniquely distributed governance. But such institutional analysis needs to be complemented by polycentric analysis of how blockchains change. We characterize such change as resulting from internal sources and external sources. Internal sources include constitutional (protocol) design and collective-choice processes for updating protocols, which help coordinate network participants and users. External sources include competitive pressure from other cryptocurrency networks. By studying two leading networks, Bitcoin and Ethereum, we illustrate how conceptualizing blockchains as competing and constitutional polycentric enterprises clarifies their processes of change.

Suggested Citation

  • Alston, Eric & Law, Wilson & Murtazashvili, Ilia & Weiss, Martin, 2022. "Blockchain networks as constitutional and competitive polycentric orders," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 707-723, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:5:p:707-723_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S174413742100093X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:5:p:707-723_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.