IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v18y2022i4p637-653_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sorting out the aid–corruption nexus

Author

Listed:
  • Pavlik, Jamie Bologna
  • Young, Andrew T.

Abstract

We employ matching methods to explore the relationships between foreign aid flows and corruption in recipient countries. Data are drawn from recipients of foreign aid for the 1996–2013 period. We find no compelling evidence of an effect running from corruption to aid flows. Furthermore, point estimates imply that corruption reforms lead countries to receive less aid. Alternatively, we generally find that, over a 10-year horizon, a sustained increase in aid leads to more corruption in a recipient. It is the sustained nature of an aid increase that seems to be important for this effect. (We generally do not report significant results for large changes in aid that are not sustained over time.)

Suggested Citation

  • Pavlik, Jamie Bologna & Young, Andrew T., 2022. "Sorting out the aid–corruption nexus," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 637-653, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:4:p:637-653_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137421000667/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:4:p:637-653_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.