IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v18y2022i4p605-620_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation, on-the-job learning, and labor contracts: an organizational equilibria approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dughera, Stefano
  • Quatraro, Francesco
  • Vittori, Claudia

Abstract

An established tenet of the literature is that the use of flexible labor leads to less innovation. Yet, less attention has been paid to the possibility that it is the decision to innovate that generates the incentive to hire on a permanent basis. The goal of this paper is to show the existence of interlocking complementarities between the firm's technological and hiring strategies. To do so, we develop a simple model where the workers’ decision to invest in human capital is affected by the type of employment contract (temporary versus permanent) and by the type of technological investments (routine versus innovative). When the firm is unable to coordinate its actions across these different domains, two equilibria simultaneously exist: in the ‘high-road’ equilibrium, firms invest more in innovative projects and hire on a permanent basis; in the ‘low-road’ equilibrium, they invest more in routine projects and hire on a temporary basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Dughera, Stefano & Quatraro, Francesco & Vittori, Claudia, 2022. "Innovation, on-the-job learning, and labor contracts: an organizational equilibria approach," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 605-620, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:4:p:605-620_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137421000497/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:18:y:2022:i:4:p:605-620_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.