IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v16y2020i1p49-64_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural soft budget constraints in new European Union member states

Author

Listed:
  • FertÅ‘, Imre
  • Bojnec, Å tefan
  • Fogarasi, József
  • Viira, Ants Hannes

Abstract

This article investigates farm investment behaviour and the presence of soft budget constraints in the agricultural sectors of three Central and Eastern European countries – Estonia, Hungary and Slovenia – using individual farm accountancy panel data for the 2007–2015 period. Gross farm investment is positively associated with gross farm investment for the previous year, growth in real sales and public investment subsidies. Mixed results for debt square and cash flow variables imply that the different investment behaviour of farms pertains to different structures of investment sources among the countries under analysis. A particularly significant negative cash flow coefficient implies strong soft budget constraints for Estonian farms, while insignificant cash flow coefficients imply weak soft budget constraints for Hungarian and Slovenian farms.

Suggested Citation

  • FertÅ‘, Imre & Bojnec, Å tefan & Fogarasi, József & Viira, Ants Hannes, 2020. "Agricultural soft budget constraints in new European Union member states," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 49-64, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:49-64_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137418000395/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krzysztof Firlej & Sebastian Kubala, 2021. "The Financial Determinants of Investment Level Based on the Direction of Production of Agricultural Enterprises in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 140-152.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:16:y:2020:i:1:p:49-64_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.