IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v44y2022i2p246-267_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Idleness And The Very Sparing Hand Of God: The Invisible Tie Between Hume’S Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion And Smith’S Wealth Of Nations

Author

Listed:
  • Santori, Paolo

Abstract

In the eighteenth-century Scottish and British cultural context, idleness was a central issue for religion, literature, art, and philosophy. This paper analyzes the reflections of David Hume and Adam Smith on idleness and commercial society. Hume advanced his most provocative view on the subject in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779), where idleness is represented as the endowment made by the “very sparing hand” of the “author of nature” to humanity. My argument is that Smith’s view on idleness that was advanced in the Wealth of Nations (1776) is connected to Hume’s Dialogues, as Smith’s invisible hand defeats idleness through a combination of self-interest, the propensity to exchange, and the division of labor. The broader aim of this study is to add to the philosophical relationship between the Scottish philosophers.

Suggested Citation

  • Santori, Paolo, 2022. "Idleness And The Very Sparing Hand Of God: The Invisible Tie Between Hume’S Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion And Smith’S Wealth Of Nations," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 246-267, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:44:y:2022:i:2:p:246-267_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837221000080/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:44:y:2022:i:2:p:246-267_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.