IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v44y2022i1p24-50_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hereditarianism, Eugenics, And American Social Science In The Interwar Years: Meet The Carverians

Author

Listed:
  • Fiorito, Luca
  • Erasmo, Valentina

Abstract

Like other Progressive Era reformers, Thomas Nixon Carver promoted a form of biology-infused social science that included both eugenics and a strong version of hereditarianism. Carver was also a charismatic teacher who trained several generations of economists and sociologists at Harvard. In this paper we will focus on the contribution of three of them: James A. Field, Norman E. Himes, and Carl S. Joslyn. These authors differ in terms of style, method, and emphasis—with Field and Himes more interested in population and birth control issues, and Joslyn in the dynamics of social stratification. As it will be shown below, however, all of them reveal an explicit commitment to hereditarianism and eugenics, which can be directly traced back to Carver’s influence during their student days at Harvard.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiorito, Luca & Erasmo, Valentina, 2022. "Hereditarianism, Eugenics, And American Social Science In The Interwar Years: Meet The Carverians," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 24-50, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:24-50_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837220000486/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:24-50_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.