IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v43y2021i4p590-603_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Keynes’S Treatise, Statistical Inference, And Statistical Practice In Interwar Economics In The United States

Author

Listed:
  • Biddle, Jeff E.

Abstract

In his Treatise on Probability John Maynard Keynes criticized the tools of statistical inference derived from probability that were coming into use in the early twentieth century, and outlined an alternative approach to statistical inference based on the logic of induction. This essay argues that Keynes’s ideas were embraced and echoed by several leading US economists during the 1920s and 1930s, including those developing and applying the most sophisticated statistical methods of the day. These economists expressed views regarding statistical inference that were quite similar to those found in Keynes’s Treatise, often citing Keynes as an authority in support. Also, the inferential methods recommended and actually employed by these writers were consistent with Keynes’s ideas about the proper methods of statistical inference.

Suggested Citation

  • Biddle, Jeff E., 2021. "Keynes’S Treatise, Statistical Inference, And Statistical Practice In Interwar Economics In The United States," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 590-603, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:43:y:2021:i:4:p:590-603_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837221000389/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:43:y:2021:i:4:p:590-603_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.