IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v40y2018i04p539-560_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clashing Analyses Of Speculation And The Early Regulation Of Us Futures Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Berdell, John
  • Choi, Jin Wook

Abstract

This article examines the early regulation of futures markets in the 1920s and 1930s. We contrast the analysis of speculation developed by the Grain Futures Administration (GFA) with Holbrook Working’s. Within the GFA we focus on Paul Mehl, who directed the statistical analysis of order flows, trade volumes, and positions that supported the GFA’s policy recommendations. In retrospect Working was the most prominent academic analyst of futures markets. The relationship between the GFA and Working was complex and at times intimately collaborative, but the New Deal provoked sharp disagreement. Working rejected the tighter trading rules advocated by the GFA as counterproductive and tried to persuade the Secretary of Agriculture to embrace a discretionary approach to regulation based upon his analysis of neighboring futures prices (the Working curve) and his distinctive conception of “perfect markets†—a nuanced version of the subsequent efficient market hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Berdell, John & Choi, Jin Wook, 2018. "Clashing Analyses Of Speculation And The Early Regulation Of Us Futures Markets," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(4), pages 539-560, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:40:y:2018:i:04:p:539-560_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837218000573/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:40:y:2018:i:04:p:539-560_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.