IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v37y2015i03p387-410_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harvard Meets The Crisis: The Monetary Theory And Policy Of Lauchlin B. Currie, Jacob Viner, John H. Williams, And Harry D. White

Author

Listed:
  • Alacevich, Michele
  • Asso, Pier Francesco
  • Nerozzi, Sebastiano

Abstract

The paper discusses the interpretation of the Great Depression and the policy decision making by four Harvard economists: Lauchlin B. Currie, Jacob Viner, John H. Williams, and Harry D. White. All were eminent scholars in the field of monetary and international economics, and were deeply involved in policy decisions during the New Deal. We will discuss how their Harvard training provided them with a common methodological and analytical perspective, and how this common perspective translated into specific policies when they moved from the academia to public service in the US administration. Their interpretation of the causes of the Great Depression and their policy proposals show the eclectic approach that these four economists had to monetary, fiscal, and economic analysis, and the points of contact with both the US monetarist tradition and the work of John Maynard Keynes. At the same time, this very eclecticism, far from making them part of the monetarist or the Keynesian schools, characterized them as a group of their own: a network of scholars who, by virtue of their studies and the evolution of their professional careers, developed a style of analysis and policy prescriptions that deeply influenced the nature of the New Deal.

Suggested Citation

  • Alacevich, Michele & Asso, Pier Francesco & Nerozzi, Sebastiano, 2015. "Harvard Meets The Crisis: The Monetary Theory And Policy Of Lauchlin B. Currie, Jacob Viner, John H. Williams, And Harry D. White," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 387-410, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:37:y:2015:i:03:p:387-410_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837215000292/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Al-Jarhi, Mabid, 2017. "Inefficiencies in Search Models: The Case for Islamic Finance," MPRA Paper 82064, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Oct 2017.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:37:y:2015:i:03:p:387-410_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.