IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v37y2015i02p277-289_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

€Œa Tax On The Many, To Enrich A Few†: Jacksonian Democracy Vs. The Protective Tariff

Author

Listed:
  • Belko, William S.

Abstract

The core concepts underlying Jacksonian Democracy—equal protection of the laws; an aversion to a moneyed aristocracy, exclusive privileges, and monopolies, and a predilection for the common man; majority rule; and the welfare of the community over the individual—have long been defined almost exclusively by the Bank War, which commenced in earnest with the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828. Yet, this same rhetoric proved far more pervasive and consistent when one considers the ardent opposition to the protective system. Opponents of the protective tariff, commencing with the Tariff of 1816 and continuing unabated to the Walker Tariff of 1846, thus contributed directly to the development of Jacksonian Democracy, and, by introducing and continually employing this language, gave to the tariff debates in the United States a unique angle that differed from the debates in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Belko, William S., 2015. "€Œa Tax On The Many, To Enrich A Few†: Jacksonian Democracy Vs. The Protective Tariff," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(2), pages 277-289, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:37:y:2015:i:02:p:277-289_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837215000097/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:37:y:2015:i:02:p:277-289_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.