IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v35y2013i04p449-469_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Progressivism and Institutionalism: Albert Benedict Wolfe on Eugenics

Author

Listed:
  • Fiorito, Luca

Abstract

Albeit concerned with the biological element in social evolution, Albert B. Wolfe was among the very few economists of the progressive era who openly expressed their concerns about certain implications of eugenic rhetoric for the social science. Specifically, Wolfe questioned the strong hereditary boundaries that more extreme eugenicists suggested about human beings. A careful examination of Wolfe’s writings reveals that his reaction was rooted in the belief that many of the social problems that eugenicists attributed to hereditary limitations were actually imputable to the influence that the social, economic, and physical environment exercised on the individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiorito, Luca, 2013. "Between Progressivism and Institutionalism: Albert Benedict Wolfe on Eugenics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 449-469, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:35:y:2013:i:04:p:449-469_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S105383721300028X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Foresti, Tiziana, 2018. "Journal of the History of Economic Thought Preprints - Eugenics and Socialist Thought in the Progressive Era: The Case of James Medbery Mackaye," SocArXiv tzcef, Center for Open Science.
    2. Fiorito, Luca & Erasmo, Valentina, 2022. "Hereditarianism, Eugenics and American Social Science in the Interwar Years: Meet the Carverians," SocArXiv 7t59c, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:35:y:2013:i:04:p:449-469_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.