IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v33y2011i04p527-550_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Economics And The €Œrussian Case†: The Impact Of Russia’S Realities And Thinkers In The Mid-Twentieth-Century Debate On Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • ADAMOVSKY, EZEQUIEL

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore whether there is a relevant impact of the Russian case and of Russian economic thought on the twentieth-century Western debate on economic development. It is argued that things Russian continued to have an impact on this notion, similar to the one we have found for the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Russia’s historical experience provided an important standpoint from which to think and rethink the meaning of economic development. As in the previous centuries, Russia’s paradoxical presence—between Europe and Asia, backward but also modern, an “apprentice†who now claimed the position of a teacher—helped to spark new thinking. The resistance of some of her intellectuals and policy makers to accept the certainties of the mainstream of the economic science contributed to raise doubts regarding the validity of Western conceptual frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Adamovsky, Ezequiel, 2011. "Development Economics And The €Œrussian Case†: The Impact Of Russia’S Realities And Thinkers In The Mid-Twentieth-Century Debate On Economic Development," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(4), pages 527-550, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:33:y:2011:i:04:p:527-550_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837211000319/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:33:y:2011:i:04:p:527-550_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.