The Concept Of An Agricultural Surplus, From Petty To Smith
AbstractEveryone has to eat, so those who produce food must produce enough to feed themselves and to feed all those who do not produce their own food. Once stated. this is trivially obvious but, I will argue, making that simple relation between agriculture and the rest of the economy explicit and, at least in principle, quantifiable played a significant role in the development of economic thinking in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This paper will focus on a very specific way of posing the question. Many of the most important economic writers of the period (Petty, Cantillon, Hutcheson, Hume, Steuart, Mirabeau, Smith and others) used arguments of the form: x men can feed y, where y > x. A series of questions naturally follow. Will the surplus be produced at all? How is it transferred to those who consume it? What are the 'superfluous hands' (in Humeâs terms) to do? It is impossible to pose these questions without thinking about the economy as a whole, and the way different sectors hang together. The common thread that runs through eighteenth-century discussions of surplus is a concern with the relation between industry and agriculture, and the potential for development arising from their interplay. There is, however, a clear discontinuity between the eighteenth-century view of agricultural surplus discussed here and the later tradition which links a concept of surplus to income distribution and pricing. Writers before Smith did not generally conceptualize income distribution in terms of the division of a defined total income between different functional shares, nor was there any consistent tradition linking income shares to the concept of an agricultural surplus as discussed here.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Cambridge University Press in its journal Journal of the History of Economic Thought.
Volume (Year): 33 (2011)
Issue (Month): 04 (December)
Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK
Fax: +44 (0)1223 325150
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_HETProvider-Email:email@example.com
Other versions of this item:
- Anthony Brewer, 2008. "The Concept of an Agricultural Surplus, from Petty to Smith," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 08/602, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
- B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Serrano, Franklin & Mazat, Numa, 2013. "Quesnay and the analysis of the surplus in an agrarian capitalist economy," MPRA Paper 47781, University Library of Munich, Germany.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.