IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v28y2006i01p111-118_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further Thoughts on Clarifying the Idea of Dissent: The Russian and Soviet Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Barnett, Vincent

Abstract

In his Journal of the History of Economic Thought article, “A Suggestion for Clarifying the Study of Dissent in Economics,†Roger Backhouse usefully proposed some terminological clarifications with respect to studying the ideas of disagreement, controversy, and dissent in (Western) economic discourse, heterodoxy being defined as a more narrow category than dissent. Backhouse also wrote that “the ideas on which Marxist, Radical, and Post Keynesian economics are based were arguably never widely held†(Backhouse 2004, p. 265).

Suggested Citation

  • Barnett, Vincent, 2006. "Further Thoughts on Clarifying the Idea of Dissent: The Russian and Soviet Experience," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 111-118, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:28:y:2006:i:01:p:111-118_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837200009081/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivan Boldyrev & Martin Kragh, 2013. "The fate of social sciences in Soviet Russia: the case of Isaak Il’ich Rubin," HSE Working papers WP BRP 17/HUM/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:28:y:2006:i:01:p:111-118_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.