IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v6y1971i02p763-776_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk, Return, and the Morphology of Commercial Banking

Author

Listed:
  • Emery, John T.

Abstract

To assure that the commercial banking industry's performance serves the “convenience and needs†of the public, bank supervisory authorities have been vested with broad powers to alter the competitive environment in bank markets. While several criteria have been used to evaluate the effects of entry, merger, branching, and other changes in the allocation of bank resources, the results have been largely inconclusive. Since the regulatory authorities have pursued somewhat conflicting objectives in seeking a “failure-proof†system that is also “efficient,†there may be no single criterion for evaluation of bank behavior that is wholly consistent with the behavior predicted by the neoclassical theory of the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Emery, John T., 1971. "Risk, Return, and the Morphology of Commercial Banking," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 763-776, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:6:y:1971:i:02:p:763-776_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000021682/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duong Thuy Nguyen & Huyen Thanh Ta & Huong Thi Diem Nguyen, 2018. "What Determines the Profitability of Vietnam Commercial Banks?," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 231-245, February.
    2. Mohammad M. Humeedat, 2018. "Earnings Management to Avoid Financial Distress and Improve Profitability: Evidence from Jordan," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 222-230, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:6:y:1971:i:02:p:763-776_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.