IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v19y1984i01p11-28_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Behavior of Stock Returns: Is It Stationary or Evolutionary?

Author

Listed:
  • Hsu, D. A.

Abstract

Empirical studies of the behavior of stock returns are important for several reasons. First, the nature of stock return behavior is fundamental to the formulation of the concept of “risk†(or “uncertainty†) in various financial theories and models. Second, the measurement of risk depends heavily on properties (such as the stationarity, long-tailedness, finiteness of the second and higher moments, etc.) of empirical stock return distributions. Third, various tests for the empirical validity of financial models [28] and the applications of these models (e.g., to the evaluation of investment performances [21], [22]) rely to a considerable extent on the steadiness over time of stock return distributions and the constancy of systematic risk. Fourth, several important pricing models for stock options, warrants, convertible debentures, and other similar financial instruments usually require explicit estimates of stock return variances [5]; the usefulness of such models depends largely on the adequacy (e.g., the finiteness, accuracy, etc.) and the stationarity of the variance measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsu, D. A., 1984. "The Behavior of Stock Returns: Is It Stationary or Evolutionary?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 11-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:19:y:1984:i:01:p:11-28_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000011108/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moews, Ben & Ibikunle, Gbenga, 2020. "Predictive intraday correlations in stable and volatile market environments: Evidence from deep learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    2. Mougoue, Mbodja & Whyte, Ann Marie, 1996. "Stock returns and volatility: An empirical investigation of the German and French equity markets," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 253-263.
    3. Rita Laura D’Ecclesia & Daniele Clementi, 2021. "Volatility in the stock market: ANN versus parametric models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 1101-1127, April.
    4. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    5. Hans Dillen & Bo Stoltz, 1999. "The distribution of stock market returns and the market model," Finnish Economic Papers, Finnish Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 41-56, Spring.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:19:y:1984:i:01:p:11-28_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.