IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v12y1977i03p491-497_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Ranking of Doctoral Programs by Financial Research Contributions of Graduates

Author

Listed:
  • Klemkosky, Robert C.
  • Tuttle, Donald L.

Abstract

Published scholarly research is asserted to be a major criteria used to judge or assess the quality of a university's faculty. This assertion has been supported in many of the academic disciplines by comparing peer ratings of graduate programs and the research productivity of the faculty of those programs. In the economics area, John J. Siegfried [ 7] found a significant relationship between peer ratings of economics departments, using the ratings of the first American Council on Education study by Cartter, and the number of available pages contributed by the department to the leading economic academic journals. A recent study by Klemkosky and Tuttle [6] found the same relationship between an academic institution's published research productivity and the quality of the institution's graduate finance programs as rated by peers, using the survey results of Brooker and Shinoda [3] to determine peer ratings. The importance of published research in turn is recognized by many academic institutions since the relative quality and quantity of published research is one of the major criteria used in making faculty promotion and tenure decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Klemkosky, Robert C. & Tuttle, Donald L., 1977. "A Ranking of Doctoral Programs by Financial Research Contributions of Graduates," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 491-497, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:12:y:1977:i:03:p:491-497_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000023115/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean Heck & Philip Cooley, 2008. "Sixty years of research leadership: contributing authors and institutions to the journal of finance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 287-309, October.
    2. Currie, Russell R. & Pandher, Gurupdesh S., 2011. "Finance journal rankings and tiers: An Active Scholar Assessment methodology," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-20, January.
    3. Kam C. Chan & Anna Fung & Hung-Gay Fung & Jot Yau, 2016. "A Citation Analysis of Business Ethics Research: A Global Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 557-573, July.
    4. Reinartz, Sebastian J. & Urban, Daniel, 2017. "Finance conference quality and publication success: A conference ranking," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 155-174.
    5. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z., 1990. "An Open Model of Curriculum Content Knowledge in Agricultural Economics Master's Degree Programs," 1990 Conference (34th), February 13-15, 1990, Brisbane, Australia 144904, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Nianhang Xu & Kam C. Chan & Chih-Hsiang Chang, 2016. "A quality-based global assessment of financial research," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 605-631, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:12:y:1977:i:03:p:491-497_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.