IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v9y2022i3p379-394_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Generalizability of Online Experiments Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Peyton, Kyle
  • Huber, Gregory A.
  • Coppock, Alexander

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic imposed new constraints on empirical research, and online data collection by social scientists increased. Generalizing from experiments conducted during this period of persistent crisis may be challenging due to changes in how participants respond to treatments or the composition of online samples. We investigate the generalizability of COVID era survey experiments with 33 replications of 12 pre-pandemic designs, fielded across 13 quota samples of Americans between March and July 2020. We find strong evidence that pre-pandemic experiments replicate in terms of sign and significance, but at somewhat reduced magnitudes. Indirect evidence suggests an increased share of inattentive subjects on online platforms during this period, which may have contributed to smaller estimated treatment effects. Overall, we conclude that the pandemic does not pose a fundamental threat to the generalizability of online experiments to other time periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Peyton, Kyle & Huber, Gregory A. & Coppock, Alexander, 2022. "The Generalizability of Online Experiments Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 379-394, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:379-394_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263021000178/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:9:y:2022:i:3:p:379-394_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.