IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v8y2021i3p296-309_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getting the Message? Choice, Self-Selection, and the Efficacy of Social Movement Arguments

Author

Listed:
  • Testa, Paul F.
  • Williams, Tarah
  • Britzman, Kylee
  • Hibbing, Matthew V.

Abstract

The dynamics of choice and self-selection are central features of politics but absent from most experimental designs. We show how designs that incorporate choice, by allowing some subjects the option to receive or avoid treatment, can be extended by randomizing conditional on subjects’ treatment choices to answer further questions of interest while preserving statistical power. We apply this design to study how the gender of messengers for the #MeToo social movement conditions who receives the movement’s message and how they respond. Our results, from both convenience and nationally representative samples, suggest that #MeToo movement’s message reaches a wide audience with the intended effect. The potential for backlash in response to the message appears limited but more likely when this message is delivered by a woman.

Suggested Citation

  • Testa, Paul F. & Williams, Tarah & Britzman, Kylee & Hibbing, Matthew V., 2021. "Getting the Message? Choice, Self-Selection, and the Efficacy of Social Movement Arguments," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 296-309, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:296-309_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205226302000024X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:296-309_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.