IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v8y2021i1p75-84_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Do You Loathe? Feelings toward Politicians vs. Ordinary People in the Opposing Party

Author

Listed:
  • Kingzette, Jon

Abstract

Scholars, the media, and ordinary people alike express alarm at the apparent loathing between Democrats and Republicans in the mass public. However, the evidence of such loathing typically comes from survey items that measure attitudes toward the Democratic and Republican Parties, rather than attitudes toward ordinary partisans. Using a nationally representative survey, I find that Democrats and Republicans have substantially more positive feelings toward ordinary people belonging to the opposing party than they do toward politicians in the opposing party and the opposing party itself. These results indicate that research relying on measures of feelings toward the opposing “Party” vastly overstates levels of partisan animosity in the American public and demonstrate the need to distinguish between attitudes toward party elites and ordinary partisans in future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kingzette, Jon, 2021. "Who Do You Loathe? Feelings toward Politicians vs. Ordinary People in the Opposing Party," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 75-84, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:75-84_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263020000093/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcos Mayo-Cubero & Lucía García-Carretero & María-José Establés & Luis-Miguel Pedrero-Esteban, 2023. "The EU as an ATM? Media Perception Analysis of Next Generation Funds in Spain," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 86-100.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:75-84_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.