IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v7y2020i3p199-208_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Deliberative Education Increase Civic Competence? Results from a Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Persson, Mikael
  • Andersson, Klas
  • Zetterberg, Pär
  • Ekman, Joakim
  • Lundin, Simon

Abstract

How should education be structured to most effectively increase civic outcomes such as political knowledge and democratic values? We present results from a field experiment in which we compare the effects of deliberative education and traditional teacher-centered education. The study is the largest field experiment on deliberative education to date and involved more than 1,200 students in 59 classrooms. We test the effects on four forms of civic competence: political knowledge, political interest, democratic values, and political discussion. In contrast to previous research, we find little evidence that deliberative education significantly increases civic competence.

Suggested Citation

  • Persson, Mikael & Andersson, Klas & Zetterberg, Pär & Ekman, Joakim & Lundin, Simon, 2020. "Does Deliberative Education Increase Civic Competence? Results from a Field Experiment," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 199-208, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:7:y:2020:i:3:p:199-208_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263019000290/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:7:y:2020:i:3:p:199-208_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.