IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v5y2018i01p39-55_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Bringing Situation Back In

Author

Listed:
  • Ihme, Toni Alexander
  • Tausendpfund, Markus

Abstract

One of the best-known empirical findings in the political sciences is the gender difference in political knowledge: women show less political knowledge than men. Conventional research argues that this difference is mainly a product of socialization, structural factors, and biology. Our paper brings a new perspective to the explanation of the gender gap in political knowledge. Based on an online survey and an experiment1, we emphasize the relevance of gender stereotypes as a situational pressure that reduces the performance of women in a political knowledge test. Two conclusions emerge from the analysis: First, our results indicate the existence of a negative stereotype related to the political knowledge of women. Second, the activation of gender stereotypes affects performance on a political knowledge test. Consistent with previous research on stereotype threat, our results indicate that the performance of men on a political knowledge test is affected by gender stereotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ihme, Toni Alexander & Tausendpfund, Markus, 2018. "Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Bringing Situation Back In," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 39-55, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:5:y:2018:i:01:p:39-55_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263017000215/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:5:y:2018:i:01:p:39-55_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.