IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v3y2016i02p164-173_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion Group Composition and Deliberation Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias
  • Nickerson, David W.
  • Keane, Michael J.

Abstract

In order to encouragee broad participation in deliberative forums, it is important to understand how people from politically less powerful groups perceive the deliberative experience and how discussion group composition affects their experiences. Using data from 27 deliberative polls from 2004, we examine how four individual characteristics (sex, age, race, and education) and randomly assigned small group composition predict participants’ attitudes about the deliberative experience. We find evidence that women, young people, non-whites, and those without college degree generally evaluate the experience positively, but find no evidence for the argument that including more people from these groups would lead to more positive deliberation experience for participants from the groups. That is, there is no interaction between minority status and group composition in predicting participants’ evaluation of the deliberation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias & Nickerson, David W. & Keane, Michael J., 2016. "Discussion Group Composition and Deliberation Experience," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 164-173, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:3:y:2016:i:02:p:164-173_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263016000063/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:3:y:2016:i:02:p:164-173_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.