IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v3y2016i01p32-43_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partisanship and Perceptions of Fairness: Ignoring the Facts

Author

Listed:
  • Allen, Barbara
  • Lawrence, Eric
  • Stevens, Daniel
  • Sullivan, John

Abstract

This paper employs survey experiments to examine how contextualizing the claims made in negative political advertising affects perceptions of their fairness. This has implications for the components of fairness judgments, e.g., if “truth†is a component of fairness, being informed that a claim is untrue should undermine perceptions of its fairness, as well as for the efficacy of “fact-checking.†Our experiments on a random national telephone sample show some effects of being informed that a claim is untrue but few if it is characterized as taken out of context or as irrelevant. These findings imply that: (a) while evaluations of the truth of claims appear to be a component of fairness, considerations such as whether claims are the “whole story†or “relevant†to the decision at hand do not, and (b) contextualizing of the claims of ads in fact-checks has very little impact on perceptions of their fairness.

Suggested Citation

  • Allen, Barbara & Lawrence, Eric & Stevens, Daniel & Sullivan, John, 2016. "Partisanship and Perceptions of Fairness: Ignoring the Facts," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 32-43, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:3:y:2016:i:01:p:32-43_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263015000068/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:3:y:2016:i:01:p:32-43_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.