IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v10y2023i3p367-376_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking the Cloth: Social Norms and Elite Cues Increase Support for Masks among White Evangelical Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Adida, Claire L.
  • Cottiero, Christina
  • Falabella, Leonardo
  • Gotti, Isabel
  • Ijaz, ShahBano
  • Phillips, Gregoire
  • Seese, Michael F.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC and the WHO have recommended face masks as key to reducing viral transmission. Yet, in the USA, as the first wave erupted in the Summer of 2020, one-fifth of individuals said they wore masks at most “some of the time”, and a majority said that people in their community wore masks at most “some of the time”. What strategies most effectively encourage compliance with this critical COVID-19 prevention measure? Relying on social identity theory, we experimentally assess two possible mechanisms of compliance, elite endorsement, and social norms, among a representative sample of white US-born Evangelicals, a group that has shown resistance to prevention measures. We find evidence for both mechanisms, but social norms play a remarkably important role – increasing support for mask-wearing by 6% with spillover effects on other prevention guidelines. Our findings confirm the role that appeals to norms and elite endorsements play in shaping individual behavior and offer lessons for public health messaging.

Suggested Citation

  • Adida, Claire L. & Cottiero, Christina & Falabella, Leonardo & Gotti, Isabel & Ijaz, ShahBano & Phillips, Gregoire & Seese, Michael F., 2023. "Taking the Cloth: Social Norms and Elite Cues Increase Support for Masks among White Evangelical Americans," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 367-376, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:367-376_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2052263022000227/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:10:y:2023:i:3:p:367-376_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.