IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v10y2023i2p174-187_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Objectified and Dehumanized: Does Objectification Impact Perceptions of Women Political Candidates?

Author

Listed:
  • Gothreau, Claire M.
  • Alvarez, Amanda Milena
  • Friesen, Amanda

Abstract

Objectification and dehumanization are topics often discussed within the social psychology and feminist theory literature. Research on objectification has largely focused on the sexual objectification of women’s bodies, whereas the dehumanization literature has focused on dehumanization in the context of racial and ethnic groups. Extant political science research has only recently begun to engage with these concepts. In this manuscript, we build upon these literatures and apply these insights to questions relevant to politics. In particular, we argue that objectifying and dehumanizing portrayals of women impact how voters evaluate women politicians and how much they support gender parity in politics. Through a proposed experimental design, we test our hypothesis that the objectification of women as a group can decrease positive evaluations and likelihood of electoral support for women political candidates.

Suggested Citation

  • Gothreau, Claire M. & Alvarez, Amanda Milena & Friesen, Amanda, 2023. "Objectified and Dehumanized: Does Objectification Impact Perceptions of Women Political Candidates?," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 174-187, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:174-187_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205226302200015X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:174-187_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.