IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jexpos/v10y2023i1p34-49_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Berlinski, Nicolas
  • Doyle, Margaret
  • Guess, Andrew M.
  • Levy, Gabrielle
  • Lyons, Benjamin
  • Montgomery, Jacob M.
  • Nyhan, Brendan
  • Reifler, Jason

Abstract

Political elites sometimes seek to delegitimize election results using unsubstantiated claims of fraud. Most recently, Donald Trump sought to overturn his loss in the 2020 US presidential election by falsely alleging widespread fraud. Our study provides new evidence demonstrating the corrosive effect of fraud claims like these on trust in the election system. Using a nationwide survey experiment conducted after the 2018 midterm elections – a time when many prominent Republicans also made unsubstantiated fraud claims – we show that exposure to claims of voter fraud reduces confidence in electoral integrity, though not support for democracy itself. The effects are concentrated among Republicans and Trump approvers. Worryingly, corrective messages from mainstream sources do not measurably reduce the damage these accusations inflict. These results suggest that unsubstantiated voter-fraud claims undermine confidence in elections, particularly when the claims are politically congenial, and that their effects cannot easily be mitigated by fact-checking.

Suggested Citation

  • Berlinski, Nicolas & Doyle, Margaret & Guess, Andrew M. & Levy, Gabrielle & Lyons, Benjamin & Montgomery, Jacob M. & Nyhan, Brendan & Reifler, Jason, 2023. "The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections," Journal of Experimental Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 34-49, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:34-49_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205226302100018X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jexpos:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:34-49_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/xps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.