IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jechis/v38y1978i04p938-958_08.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Profitability of the Suez Canal as a Private Enterprise, 1859–1956

Author

Listed:
  • Hansen, Bent
  • Tourk, Khairy

Abstract

On the basis of published accounts, internal rates of return and present values are computed for capital in general and for particular investors (French shareholders and the British and Egyptian governments) from construction to nationalization of the canal. Terminal values at the nationalization had to be imputed. Rates of return are compared with opportunity costs represented by the return on alternative investments. For capital generally, French shareholders, and the British government, rates of return were 8–9 percent against opportunity costs of 3–4 percent. For the Egyptian government, corresponding figures were 2–5 and 11 percent. American investment would not have been profitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansen, Bent & Tourk, Khairy, 1978. "The Profitability of the Suez Canal as a Private Enterprise, 1859–1956," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(4), pages 938-958, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:38:y:1978:i:04:p:938-958_08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022050700087179/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:38:y:1978:i:04:p:938-958_08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jeh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.