IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jbcoan/v7y2016i03p373-399_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process, Ideology, and Willingness to Pay for Reducing Childhood Poverty

Author

Listed:
  • Ozdemir, Semra
  • Johnson, F. Reed
  • Whittington, Dale

Abstract

We investigated the perceived value of government programs on early-childhood development as a means of reducing childhood poverty. We incorporated preferences for the process as well as the outcome by developing two stated-preference survey instruments. One survey directly elicited respondents’ willingness to pay specifically for high-quality, intensive, early-childhood development programs at federal and state levels. A second survey elicited respondents’ preferences for increasing or decreasing taxes and reallocating expenditures between other government programs and early-childhood programs. We found that respondents cared greatly about how childhood poverty was reduced, not just reducing poverty per se. The perceived effectiveness of a program and ideological perspective were found to be important determinants of preferences for a poverty-reduction program. Respondents across all groups, including conservatives and respondents who perceived the effectiveness of early-childhood programs to be low, were not in favor of reducing the early-childhood program.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozdemir, Semra & Johnson, F. Reed & Whittington, Dale, 2016. "Process, Ideology, and Willingness to Pay for Reducing Childhood Poverty," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 373-399, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:7:y:2016:i:03:p:373-399_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2194588816000178/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:7:y:2016:i:03:p:373-399_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bca .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.