IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jbcoan/v12y2021i3p441-465_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Challenges in Estimating the Lifetime Medical Care Cost Externality of Obesity

Author

Listed:
  • Schell, Robert C.
  • Just, David R.
  • Levitsky, David A.

Abstract

There is a great deal of variability in estimates of the lifetime medical care cost externality of obesity, partly due to a lack of transparency in the methodology behind these cost models. Several important factors must be considered in producing the best possible estimate, including age-related weight gain, differential life expectancy, identifiability, and cost model selection. In particular, age-related weight gain represents an important new component to recent cost estimates. Without accounting for age-related weight gain, a study relies on the untenable assumption that people remain the same weight throughout their lives, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of the evolution and development of the obesity crisis. This study seeks to inform future researchers on the best methods and data available both to estimate age-related weight gain and to accurately and consistently estimate obesity’s lifetime external medical care costs. This should help both to create a more standardized approach to cost estimation as well as encourage more transparency between all parties interested in the question of obesity’s lifetime cost and, ultimately, evaluating the benefits and costs of interventions targeting obesity at various points in the life course.

Suggested Citation

  • Schell, Robert C. & Just, David R. & Levitsky, David A., 2021. "Methodological Challenges in Estimating the Lifetime Medical Care Cost Externality of Obesity," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 441-465, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:441-465_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2194588821000063/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:441-465_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bca .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.