IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jbcoan/v12y2021i1p152-169_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost–Benefit Assessment of Public Investments in France: The Use of Counter-Experts

Author

Listed:
  • Baumstark, Luc
  • Guesnerie, Roger
  • Ni, Jincheng
  • Ourliac, Jean-Paul

Abstract

Socioeconomic evaluation of a public investment helps to understand its value for the community, and it also improves an investment by analyzing its different components, and the risks inherent in its completion. The Act of 31 December 2012 about Public Finance Planning makes it mandatory in France for project sponsors to conduct an ex-ante socioeconomic evaluation of all public civil investments made by the State and its public institutions. An independent counter-expert assessment of the ex-ante socioeconomic evaluation is conducted for the largest projects. A permanent committee of experts has been established to specify the methodological rules for socioeconomic evaluation and define the studies and research necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Baumstark, Luc & Guesnerie, Roger & Ni, Jincheng & Ourliac, Jean-Paul, 2021. "Cost–Benefit Assessment of Public Investments in France: The Use of Counter-Experts," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 152-169, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:152-169_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2194588820000305/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:152-169_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bca .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.