IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jbcoan/v11y2020i2p221-243_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perception and Excessive Valuation of Small, Publicized Drinking Water Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Viscusi, W. Kip
  • Huber, Joel
  • Bell, Jason

Abstract

Low probability risks create challenges for individual decisions and potential pressures for government regulation. This article reports original survey evidence regarding the public’s perception and valuation of water-related risks from plastic bottles with bisphenol A, residues in drinking water of the herbicide atrazine, and trace amounts of prescription drugs in water. People who believe that they face high water-related risks generally believe that the risks apply and, given that belief, are willing to pay more to limit the risk. However, the expressed willingness to pay for risk reductions is inordinately high even among those who are unsure of whether they are even exposed to the risk, and therefore may not be reliable as values for the actual benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Viscusi, W. Kip & Huber, Joel & Bell, Jason, 2020. "The Perception and Excessive Valuation of Small, Publicized Drinking Water Risks," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 221-243, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:221-243_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2194588820000135/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jbcoan:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:221-243_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bca .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.